The law doesn't, as some believe, give unlimited deportation powers to Arizona
"The United States Constitutionforbids Arizona from supplanting the federal government's immigration regime with its own state-specific immigration policy," the suit says. "A policy that, in purpose and effect, interferes with the numerous interests the federal government must balance."
Amazingly enough the fed now considers reporting violators of federal law to be unconstitutional. Amazing no?
Here's what should happen: The judge throws out the case as the USA has no standing since it isn't harmed by the law.
Here's what could happen: The judge throws out the case on the grounds that Arizona is taking no action other than reporting violators of federal law. Additionally the judge commends Arizona for ensuring that all potential foreign nationals identified under this law have the opportunity to contact their respective consulates as required by treaty. In fact, this law may have the unintended consequence of providing yet another safeguard demonstrating that all persons within the USA are afforded full civil liberties.
Here's what's most likely to happen: The judge will decide that the fed is in the right. At the end of the day the law will be struck down by the best disinformation
Here is the text of the lawsuit for your own perusal.
Another spin on Fox News.
FTFGIMAD
Technorati Tags: Obama, Immigration, Holder, DOJ, Arizona
No comments:
Post a Comment